According to some, whenever old lose their ability to care themselves physically, mentally, and financially, it is time for younger generation to take legal responsibility for them. While there are clear arguments opposing this belief, I believe it is youngsters’ priority to take turn.
On the one hand, there are clear arguments that taking care of oldsters requires patience, perseverance and most of all economic stability. Therefore, most of young generation would run away from this responsibility, taking their parents to designated areas for old people, eventually turning the responsibility on the government. One of the main reasons can be the lack of childhood careless. Most of the parents today are became compulsive on working overtime, thus having no or limited time on their children. This in turn, causing lack of mutual bonds between parents and the children.
Ultimately, this trend causing lack of personal warmth for their parents, and resulting in above-stated poor lookout. On the other hand, I agree with the viewpoint that youngsters should take the priority to look after the olds. First and foremost, making these actions legal fosters sense of community and promotes respect towards elders, thus shaping a long-lasting and confessional traditions in the long run. Secondly, I also feel that governments enforce strict regulations on people who set aside these customs. This is because, most parents spend their life building pathways and financial resources for children to succeed. For this reason, then they become incapable on looking after themselves, it is youngsters turn to take the role. In conclusion, while there are clear opposing points against this view, I believe it is the youngsters priority to take care for their elders when they become incapable, because it fosters the sense of responsibility and creates ethical traditions